Who’s in charge?

July 31, 2011 at 7:48 pm | Posted in corporate bullys, crooks & liars, government, government spending | 7 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , ,

It seems nothing really changes.

FDR: “Government by Organized Money is Just as Dangerous as Government by Organized Mob”


The hacking of phones and invasion of privacy by the Rupert Murdoch tabloid press has been the subject of articles for years, but it took the unconscionable and illegal extracting and deleting of messages from the mobile phone of a dead British girl to bring the Murdoch empire to its knees.

Murdoch, it appears now, had bought off police, politicians, and who knows who else, as he swaggered across the Western world, creating a false, angry, populist worldview through a vast media empire. The sole purpose of this emotional, incendiary and deceptive narrative was to create governments that supported the plutocracy, not the “rabble” of democracy. The tool to accomplish this was the manipulation of the mass media to ignore facts and create a fictional “frame” that pushed populations toward acceptance of an authoritarian state, one that existed for the benefit of the wealthy.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew the danger of a Murdoch controlling, in an Orwellian fashion, the media, and the danger of the likes of the Koch Brothers financing propaganda – through lavish support of think tanks and front “activist” organizations – as well as a government run by corporate lobbyists. Whether it is ownership of the media, concentrated control of the assets of a nation by a few, or de facto corporate governance through campaign contribution leverage on Congress and the White House, Roosevelt warned:

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it comes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism – ownership of government by an individual, by a group.”

In his second inaugural speech FDR declared:

“We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace – business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.”

They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me – and I welcome their hatred.

How little has changed since those remarks were made in 1936, except there is no FDR in the White House to champion the cause of democracy for those 99 percent of Americans who are not part of “organized money.



RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Mark Karlin says it so much better than I did when I tried to say something similar. Eisenhower only saw a part of the probelm when he warned us of the “Military/Industrial Complex”. He forgot that the media could also be controlled.

    • Wow, that was fast; you now hold the record for speed commenting. I no sooner hit publish than I was notified of your response. I read your (above mentioned) post and I think you said it quite well.

      • I spotted the posting on a twitter notification. Twitter is good!

  2. […] concept got mixed up and what we are faced with now is rich hoods robbing the poor.  Yesterday I  posted an article by Mark Karlin, of The Buzzflash Blog, about the puppet masters who pull the strings of […]

  3. Mills: ‘I’m A Victim Of Tabloid Phone Hacking’…

    Paul McCartney’s ex-wife Heather Mills fears she may have been a victim in another tabloid phone hacking scandal.The publishers of Britain’s News of the World shut the publication down last month amid allegations a private investigator work…

  4. our danger at this moment is we have at least 42% of our country who agrees with this guy, thats the scary part and theres the other percentage that change their opinion by the day the media with their polls can swing their support back and forth, this is the swing vote.

  5. It earned little to no credit for its Facebook activity in the audits and that points to a broader concern Is social media an afterthought in the Obama administrations vision of open government?….Observers around the world have praised the administration s drive for Government 2.0 as a way to advance transparency accountability and citizen participation. The Open Government Directive issued by the White House in December 2009 did not explicitly address social media except to say that guidance would be coming soon. That guidance was published April 7 the same day that 29 federal agencies and departments submitted their open-government plans.

Throw in your two cents

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Entries and comments feeds.

%d bloggers like this: